Technology companies
“We need the gaps closed before a compliance audit”
Web platforms, APIs, and mobile apps that must be secure before a security review or a third-party audit.
Penetration testing →Who we help
Six security problems we handle most often
Every service line has run on live systems, and written permission was always in place before testing started.
Network security
“We do not know which paths are open from outside”
Mapping segments, firewall rules, and the access routes into internal assets that should be closed.
Network assessment →Active incident
“Something suspicious is happening and we are out of time”
Support while the incident is live, lawful evidence collection, and root cause analysis.
Incident response →Engineering teams
“Our code grew fast and was never reviewed”
Reviewing code and configuration for gaps, with patch suggestions developers can apply directly.
Secure code review →Non-technical staff
“Most incidents started with a single click”
Controlled phishing exercises and security hygiene across every layer of the organization.
Security awareness →Management and risk
“We do not know how ready our controls are”
Mapping control readiness against the framework you follow, with a priority order.
Gap assessment →
6
Service lines
6
Active divisions
36
Registered members
4
Running work programmes
How it works
A first step with a fixed scope
We open every engagement with a defined scope and deliverable, not with a guess.
01
Map
A fixed-scope assessment: what is open, how large the impact is, and what to close first.
02
Harden
Every finding comes with reproduction steps and a patch proposal; your team can verify it again on its own.
03
Keep
We stay your incident channel and periodic review partner, or hand everything over to your team.